Forums
Quorum...sec 103
Corporate & Other Laws
answered on 17-May-22 11:08
I'm not able to understand the answer 1)whether meeting was properly held or not? 2)Will agenda 1-3 pass....I.e will it properly pass
latest answer
(1) Properly held (2) Properly passed
Gauri Shete
CA Final
★ 5K+
2
480
GST APPLICABLE OR NOT
Indirect Taxation
answered on 16-May-22 20:01
Mr.X (Doctor) provides donation to Temple. Temple states Donated by Mr.A along with his hospital details In this case GST is applicable right?
latest answer
Thanks :)
Swetha S
CA Inter
★ 15K+
4
515
agency
Corporate & Other Laws
answered on 16-May-22 21:32
Is there a agency relationship between 1) employee and employer 2) servant and master since any act done by employee or servant also binds the employer and master respectively so will it create agency as in the case of principal and agent?
latest answer
ok understood Thank You :)
Vaibhav Gupta
CA Final
★ 18K+
3
449
Acceptance of Deposits
Corporate & Other Laws
answered on 16-May-22 23:44
On 30th june Paid up shares capital of â?¹65lac,Free Reseve -â?¹10lac,Share premium -â?¹20 lack,Deposits of â?¹25 lac,replayble in the current F.Y During in the month of Sept 2017.In July 2017 ,the company was in need of some short term funds to the tune of â?¹20lac-6Months.the max amt which the company may hold as deposit together with existing deposits will be---------??????? Can any one explain it ?????!!!!!!!
latest answer
Thankyou mam for ur quick response :)
Jayashree S
CA Inter
★ 2K+
3
495
Audit and Auditors
Corporate & Other Laws
answered on 16-May-22 19:59
Here prejudicial means favour or adverse ?
latest answer
Adverse
Balaji R
CA Final
★ 20K+
4
397
GCA
Corporate & Other Laws
answered on 16-May-22 18:27
Can someone pls explain me the concept of repeal in brief
latest answer
Thanks:)
Be The Change
CA Inter
★ 11K+
4
521
Partnership Act
Corporate & Other Laws
answered on 16-May-22 17:59
Is section 19(2) are the exceptions where implied authority of partner doesn't bind the firm. Also explain this example 5
latest answer
Yes , Sec 19(2) clearly states that the "Implied authority of a partner DOS NOT EMPOWER HIM to ....." These are the exceptions and beyond the scope of the implied authority of the partners. Example 5 - Here X , without the authority has borrowed and executed a promissory note which does not bind the firm as it's not part of ordinary business to borrow and execute negotiable instruments. The partner can execute , but he is personally liable for it. This is for the ordinary business. But for the commercial business (or) special business the partner can borrow and execute the negotiable instrument on behalf of the firm which binds the firm. So the underlying concept is that the THE IMPLIED AUTHORITY OF THE PARTNER MAY DIFFER IN DIFFERENT KINDS OF BUSINESS. Hope I made some sense.
Sugam SM
CA Final
★ 9K+
1
640
What is the answer this question
Corporate & Other Laws
answered on 16-May-22 17:19
What is the answer this question
latest answer
Answer is given in Page No 11 and 12 - 4 (a)(ii)
nisam M
CA Final
★ 23K+
3
614
Smal company
Corporate & Other Laws
answered on 16-May-22 15:30
Are the answer given in study material correct?? For both sub questions..
latest answer
You're welcome
Shru Kanda
CA Inter
★ 610
12
467
Indemnity nd Guarantee
Corporate & Other Laws
answered on 16-May-22 20:36
Some cases it is said that Surety is not discharged since the variation was made Beneficial to surety and few cases it is said that Surety is not discharged even if it made Beneficial to Surety. How to distinguish btwn both? How to answer in the exam?
latest answer
Tnx for responding
Be The Change
CA Inter
★ 11K+
12
516