Forums

Back

Illustration 29

Financial Reporting

Sir, why did we multiplied by 10 cases and 5 cases, as no where it is mentioned that the loss is for one case and hence i assumed it to be for all the 10 and 5 cases respectively. Video Details ------------- Ind AS - CA Final Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets #23. Illustrations 26 - 29


Hrishikesh Pradhan

Hrishikesh Pradhan

CA Final

β˜… 5K+

10-Nov-24 15:44

115

Answers (8)

Forgot CA inter question πŸ˜‚


CA Suraj Lakhotia

CA Suraj Lakhotia

Admin

10-Nov-24 15:50

Its the same question with same assumption


CA Suraj Lakhotia

CA Suraj Lakhotia

Admin

10-Nov-24 15:50

Also for 1 case you cant have multiple probabilities


CA Suraj Lakhotia

CA Suraj Lakhotia

Admin

10-Nov-24 15:51

Sorry sir but I didn't understood what you mean to say ! I understood ki it's from CA inter πŸ˜… but then we don't have to multiply with 10 and 5 right ?


Thread Starter

Hrishikesh Pradhan

Hrishikesh Pradhan

CA Final

β˜… 5K+

10-Nov-24 15:57

We need to. Loss is per case


CA Suraj Lakhotia

CA Suraj Lakhotia

Admin

10-Nov-24 16:00

CA Suraj Lakhotia Admin

We need to. Loss is per case

But sir again, it is nowhere mentioned na, how could we do it ?


Thread Starter

Hrishikesh Pradhan

Hrishikesh Pradhan

CA Final

β˜… 5K+

10-Nov-24 16:18

Thread Starter

Hrishikesh Pradhan

But sir again, it is nowhere mentioned na, how could we do it ?

Generally for expected value calculations, it is considered as per case only. Unless mention in the question.


CA Suraj Lakhotia

CA Suraj Lakhotia

Admin

11-Nov-24 10:53

Your Reply

CIN: U74999TG2017PTC116012 | GSTIN: 36AAECI4332C1Z0 | PAN: AAECI4332C

2024 IndigoLearn.com All Rights Reserved