powered by logo

Forums

Expected return under sharpe model = Alfa+Beta*market return+unexplained error

AFM

answered on 13-Jun-25 11:32

Sir, I understand that Beta × Market Return gives the expected return for a specific security. Then why do we add Alpha again? [Video Time Stamp: 12:22]

latest answer

Yes exactly

Manikyam

Manikyam

CA Final

★ 0

3

292

All 4 scenarios violating the 20% rule

AFM

answered on 12-Jun-25 22:03

Company's maximum acceptable drop in NPV = 20% of Normal NPV: 20% of ₹11,28,120=₹2,25,624 So, minimum acceptable NPV (with risk): ₹11,28,120−₹2,25,624=₹9,02,496 In cases (a), (b), and (c), a 10% adverse change causes NPV to drop >20% → Not acceptable In case (d) (poor economy), NPV = −₹88,596 → Well beyond acceptable risk So with all 4 scenarios violating the 20% rule, the project is clearly rejected. What if only 2 out of 4 (say, two variables or scenarios) have NPV drop > 20%, while the other 2 are within 20% — can the project be accepted?

latest answer

Depends on which negative scenario the company is most worried abt

Shinisha  Rose R

Shinisha Rose R

CA Final

★ 5K+

1

204

Consideration of Beta as 1

AFM

answered on 12-Jun-25 23:13

Sir, Could you explain why the Beta value is taken as 1 for Market and 0 for Treasury Bill.?

latest answer

Thank you Sir.

K Vamshi

K Vamshi

CA Final

★ 14K+

2

285

ILL-15 (Security valuation -Bonds)

AFM

answered on 11-Jun-25 19:10

Sir here in the question Bond Y is more coupon rate with less price than Bond X i.e 8% ,936.52. we can purchase the Required no.of bonds Y and liquidate them after 2 Years and get 100000 Can u tell about this sir

latest answer

Immunization

P.udaykumar Pasupulati

P.udaykumar Pasupulati

CA Final

★ 2K+

1

267

method 1

AFM

answered on 11-Jun-25 15:38

Following only method 1 is enough in the exam

latest answer

Yes Ideally they mention what they want If they do not chose the easiest method

Shinisha  Rose R

Shinisha Rose R

CA Final

★ 5K+

1

249

Security valuation - TYK 11

AFM

answered on 08-Jun-25 09:22

Instead of using D1 for price calculation why they have used D0. Are they assuming D0 itself as D1.

latest answer

If you assume ROE 1 = PAT1 / BV 0 then what they have done is right They said that in line 1 If you assume ROE 0 = PAT 0/ BV 0 then we should follow what you are suggesting i.e compute d1

Kaushik A

Kaushik A

CA Final

★ 3K+

1

256

Variance and Standard Deviation

AFM

answered on 06-Jun-25 15:03

Sir, if Variance is 0.056, so sqrt of that is 0.2368 i.e., 23%. In the other case if i take variance as 5.61115 in percentage terms (0.056*100), then the standard deviation was √5.61115 ≈ 2.3688(in percentage). Could you please clarify which is correct and why the standard deviation is being stated as 23%?

latest answer

When Return of share price is in % then SD is also in % but VAr is % square Best way is to remove % right at beginning and solve it just as a number and then add % at the end another way is to convert everything into decimal and then solve - I don't recommend it though Answer eventually will be same in al methods but best is to remove % and solve

Murali Thripuraboina

Murali Thripuraboina

CA Final

★ 3K+

1

255

Z score

AFM

answered on 02-Jun-25 13:15

@ 2.15 it is said '1.28 SD', I do not understand how that value was arrived.

latest answer

1.28

Jayanth

Jayanth

CA Final

★ 6K+

1

390

Merger

AFM

answered on 01-Jun-25 23:04

So, here in Illustration 1, part (i), when Y gets merged into X then Y doesn't exist. Then how come we can compute post merger EPS of Y?

latest answer

Thanks for the clarification. Clear now

Dhanushree Shanmugam

Dhanushree Shanmugam

CA Final

★ 3K+

2

289

Portfolio management

AFM

answered on 01-Jun-25 18:43

Explain me confidence between two stocks.. Do I have to memorize the formula.. Or it will be helpful if you can explain in simple terms

latest answer

solution

Naima Shaikh

Naima Shaikh

CA Final

★ 270

3

227